Mike Johnson (the Republican Party of Los Angeles), Speaker of the House of Representatives in the United States, listened to a speech at the Republican Republican leader of the House of Representatives in Washington, USA on November 12, 2024.
Neston Howard | Reuters
Controlling the Republicans of the House of Representatives in the United States are trying to overcome the internal differences of how to pay the presidential fee Donald Comprehensive tax cuts, tough conservatives are determined to reduce the annual federal deficit of nearly $ 2 trillion.
They prepared to vote for the fiscal decision of fiscal 2025 in a few weeks with 218 votes in a weak majority advantage of 215 votes, so they need to be almost completely completely united. This will be through Trump’s huge tax reduction, border and immigration. The key steps of the agenda such as reform and energy control.
Before the three -day policy of policy, some people publicly worried that the leadership team of the House of Speaker Mike Johnson may be at a time for offset Trump ’s $ 6 trillion tax reduction agenda. At the same time, it also solves the country’s problems of more than $ 36 trillion.
Republicans vowed to extend Trump’s tax reduction policy of Taxation and Employment (TCJA) in 2017, which will expire at the end of this year. The party -free federal budget committee estimates that this will spend more than $ 4 trillion in ten years, and the Trump campaign promise to cancel tip, overtime pay and social security welfare tax may cost another $ 1.8 trillion.
If the agreement fails, Republican lawmakers may take advantage of the strategy of bypassing the Senate Democratic Party to pass the Trump agenda by the end of May, and this requires almost all of them to be irritable.
“Most of us support TCJA. I think this is not a problem. We all want to support what President Trump is doing. But we also realize that we need to make our fiscal institutions orderly,” Michael Cloud said.
“We must make a route correction, and we must be dramatic,” he told Reuters.
Johnson said he hopes to finalize a large part of a huge legislative plan to provide funds for Trump’s priority. Republicans must also decide whether to include the upper limit of the federal government’s debt (Congress must do this this year to avoid devastating defaults) and provide disaster relief assistance to the Los Angeles community that is damaged by wildfire.
“There are many ideas on the desktop,” Johnson told reporters before the parliamentarians left Washington last week and said that his core group aims to reach an agreement on Miami.
The New York House Democratic Democratic Party leader Hakim Jeffers attacking the Republican party’s plan was “a contract against the United States.” He warned: “This will hurt families with wages, harm the middle class, hurt our children, hurt our elderly, and hurt our veterans.”
Jeffris also said that the Republican agenda will destroy the medical subsidy medical care plan for the poor and the medical care plan that provides government subsidies for non -insured workers based on the “Acts for the Acts of the Affairs Medical Act”.
The cost of Trump agenda
Republicans said that they are facing a major challenge to pay for the cost of paying enough expenditure to pay the Trump agenda, and privately worry that the hardliners insist on significantly reduced the deficit may reduce the medical subsidy funds of the hospital and the expenditure of other community services, thereby damage their voter.
Republican Republican Republican Ralph Norman said: “This incident cannot be neutral in deficit.” He added that the plan needs to “significantly” reduce deficit.
Another potential obstacle: The rising deficit in the United States is putting pressure on the bond market, pushing up the country’s lending costs. The deepening of deficit may exacerbate these concerns.
“This is an equal body”
This debate will test Trump’s request and hardships to adhere to the willingness of the Republican Party to reduce the traditional goal of cutting deficits.
“The president expressed what he wanted very clearly. What is the problem now? What do we want? This is an equal institution … we should have different opinions. If we don’t do this, we will encounter trouble because we don’t do this, because we will encounter trouble because we don’t do this, because we will encounter trouble because we don’t do this, because we will encounter trouble because we don’t do this, because we will encounter trouble because we don’t do this, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble because we do not do this, because we will encounter trouble, because we will encounter trouble because we do not do this, because we will encounter trouble because we do not do this because we will encounter trouble because we do We are no longer the Republic of the Constitution, and the Georgia Republican member Richard McCockerk said.
The House of Representatives Budget Committee distributed a list of 50 pages of proposal, including trillions of dollars of funds, from the idea of ​​widely supporting the party (such as abolishing green energy tax claims) to controversial ideas (including federal housing mortgage Loan interest deduction).
Trump’s plan to raise a 10%tariff on imported goods by 10%of the imported goods was also opposed by conservatives of the House of Representatives.
“I don’t agree with taxes. Tariffs are just a tax,” said the main financial hawk and Kentucky Republican senator Rand Paul.
Although Republicans tried to reach an agreement, the Tennessee Republican member Tim Bercheter said he was worried that the additional funds of up to $ 200 billion in the Pentagon may absorb his savings to solve the deficit. But he did not say that such a result would cause him to oppose the solution.
“If I see us in the right direction, it is enough,” Bychet said. “However, we are lying to ourselves and lying to the public. When we go home, we say that we have to do these things. Then we come here, blink, nod, sell people to others.” We go home and we go home and Elected again, this is a crazy system.
